Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It can be effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
If your DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and move forward according to your law. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
Just a couple years ago, searching for case precedent was a difficult and time consuming activity, demanding people today to search through print copies of case law, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a bunch of case law search options, and a lot of sources offer free access to case law.
PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there could exist conflicts between the different reduce appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-thirty day period report for read more the court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to adhere to.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established by the government.
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common law traditions create differences in how that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale behind their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the broader legal principles.
Commonly, only an appeal accepted from the court of past vacation resort will resolve such differences and, for many reasons, these appeals are sometimes not granted.
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may possibly look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more